Skyrim - Civil War Cyrodiil - No emperor. AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. No single, globally accepted treaty lists all war crimes. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? (Read 1746 times) It adds immersion. Has lost 85% of its territory in the 4th era. The latter is too intricately tied in with atavistic gameplay systems for us to extrapolate anything deeper than game over. moments fr. Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. Really!? It stopped short of clarifying quite what these consequences should be, suggesting only that "game scenarios should not reward players for actions that in real life would be considered war crimes." Memedroid: the best site to see, rate and share funny memes! And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Every time someone blows up my car in GTA, I want the recovery cost irl. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Blockland Forums Home; Help; Login; Register; Blockland Forums . Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? People playground players. The way that mobile phone hacking lets us see into the personal problems of potential targets in Watch Dogs. Success means blending in with the terror squad, and it's up to the player to decide whether that extends as far as shooting civilians. Jeezsmdh. Plenty of warfare though. It involves using at least one more brain cell, and that's always a good thing. Yeeeeah, I'm doomed if they manage to do anything with this. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed. Anyone who plays Saints Row or GTA would REALLY be in trouble. That sounds like a really fun video game. You are using an out of date browser. Currently, the American Psychological Association is reviewing its 2005 statement that said there "appears to be evidence" of this; a coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, arguing that, based on the current research, some assertions in the statement "cannot be supported.". Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Players need to be able to live with the consequences of actions in more subtle ways. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. I kill every civilian as a sith in Star Wars: The Old Republic. Boy they would hate what I did with my evil characters in skyrim and fallout 4. PhantOS. April 13, 2022 at 5:01 a.m. I don't think it's a bad idea from my completely subjective moral standpoint. Here's a rundown of the legal situation as the international community looks for ways to hold Russia accountable for the killings, widespread destruction and human rights abuses that have been. Lemme see my list I got: Animal abuse (we all did the sheep thing Im nit the only one!!! Though this kind of makes me think of a bunch of 10-year-olds running around in the deserts of the Middle East, screaming long lines of cuss words at each other while shooting anything that moves. Your anaconda definitely wants some. Don't shoot the civilians. There's no reason in debating/arguing this, it just shouldn't be the issue. Hahaha 'no russian' would have half the men ages like 18-30 locked up and on death row right now. Me who plays all the people chemical warfare. Is this feasible? The ICRC says sanitizing video games is not realistic. to FFXIV. And importantly it adds: We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. The ICRC believes there is a place for international humanitarian law (the law of armed conflict) in video games, the organization that works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people caught in war zones said in a statement on their website. Odd as it sounds, but I'd actually enjoy seeing this sort of thing in those military simulators. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." By checking this box I consent to the use of my information for the above purpose. It would take a LOOOT of work to make it actually an engaging aspect of FPS games, though. What the public fails to realize is that video games are big stress relievers for a lot of folk, myself included. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? Anyone who's played a GTA game knows you want to avoid killing cops because the game is unplayable if your wanted level is filled up. Ark players. Thanks for submitting to r/MemeTemplatesOfficial. The BBC were quoting The Red Cross in an interview with The Guardian - these were not the opinions of the BBC. Signup Login. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. "It is a war crime to attack a nuclear power plant," the embassy said on its official Twitter feed on March 4. Remember, no russian. Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. But what it wouldn't let you do was kill passing civilians: collateral damage of this sort took a big chunk off your health bar. His claim may be valid: in 2011, British broadcaster ITVused footage from video gameArma II to illustrate purported paramilitary action. It's political correctness gone mad, though I fear this goes deeper than that and is more of a spin on the usual attempt for the mainstream media - and their various allies - to paint large portions of the gaming community as budding psychopaths. So how can players be made accountable for their actions beyond simple gameplay devices? I don't think Prototype would count under "realistic war game", (PS, that's a cool raccoon drawing. There are many games which offer zero harassment venues, as does Eve in its NPC corp system. Should Gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? to FFXIV. 1. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Buddy, that's amature stuff compared to r/RimWorld. Doesn't seem like an outrageous demand to me. It's still dumb. AAA Hard Surface integrator for Characters, Concept artist and Asset artist responsible for: - military enemy characters. Seems to me that without naming names there are a fair number of politicians in my country and others that we can comfortably say are guilty of willful war crimes and crimes against humanity, but instead y'all wanna go on a witch hunt because someone plays Terran in Starcraft 2? #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. And it probably helps explain just how . Press J to jump to the feed. warp scramble them for 8 hours sometime, that's grief. It's supposedly what we all agreed were the "rules" of war. We use Mailchimp to store this information and send emails. Great read! Post your templates or request one instead! For more information, please see our The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. I can neither confirm nor deny the building of Auschwitz in minecraft. The original Pokmon TCG base set is coming back as a trio of premium decks, The M1-powered iPad Air gets its biggest discount of $100 off once again, Resident Evil Village is a great PSVR 2 shooter, if you can stomach it. I just wanted the Sudetenland. Realism is good, yes, but to an extent. The sequence was brave, but also clumsily handled, exploitative and incongruous; however, it did place the player in a position where many felt they genuinely had to weigh up their moral proclivities with the demands of the gameplay mission. Let's be honest here - most of what is considered to be a 'war crime' these days tends to only be a 'war crime' when the enemy does it. Often the most affecting moments are those hidden in momentary or supplementary features. 1.5K 53. What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. Both Conservatives and Liberals act like such fucking cunts when it comes to violent video games. We are not talking about censorship or banning anything, he added. Privacy Policy. 431 39. Ill be 100% on board.. the second democrats are held to the constitution. And if a person can not make the difference between reality and a game then they need help from a psychiatrist and as such would not be able to be held accountable for the "War crimes" they did in a game. I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. A Q&A document posted on the organisations website explains: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for peoples actions and decisions. I dunno, it just frustrates me that people keep poking s**t when there is obviously nothing wrong with it. If you are having trouble subscribing with this form, try the version here. "Nobody ever considers themselves to be the villain.". Though I actually play pretty nice. Should Gamers be penalised for carrying out unlawful acts in a Video Game? Just that their warcrimes have consequences. 99% of the possible targets on the field were in fact baddies and had the free to kill on them. Article (with reader comments) from The Guardian. One question though, is "Teabagging" a war crime? We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. In Operation Wolf, accidentally machine gunning a glitching sprite that vaguely resembled a non-military human could be easily divorced from the reality of armed conflict. 2023 Vox Media, LLC. 17 Sep 2022 19:30:26 . "We're not trying to make games boring or preachy, but were hoping that the ones that offer a realistic portrayal of a modern battlefield can incorporate some sort of reward or penalties depending on whether they follow the basic rules of armed conflict. Home article Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? It's not interested in excising the offending scenarios from games entirely, arguing that "sanitizing videogames of such acts is not realistic" given such atrocities do occur in real conflict. It even let you control the action with an Uzi-style sub-machine gun bolted to the cabinet. It essentially boils down to "shoot" and "don't shoot" targets like in the arcade shooters. Cookie Notice . Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. Lol. Complete address if you would like to receive our posted newsletter. I'm sorry guys. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. Monster_Slayer 1 may 2020. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Images, GIFs and videos featured seven times a day. im fucked 6 ways from Sunday. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. Seriously, including this sort of responsible realism isn't going to spoil anyone's fun. But then, of course, these examples offer more than a mere punishment mechanic which is what the ICRC seems to be asking for. You can war dec any PC corp for any reason, keep the war going for as long as you want, suicide gank every one of their toons when they leave for NPC corps and it still aint griefing. Not to mention that a vast majority of first person shooters are played by teenagers and young adults - to think that anyone would seriously consider incarcerating hundreds of thousands of children because they play video games blows my mind. See our privacy policy for more information. We also have an Instagram page, where memes & templates are posted daily! With this thinking Ill get a call from my insurance company when I crash a G6 in Grand theft auto. Here is however what I find funny about the whole video game business and the media / government / politicians. We are, though, surely heading into an era where gamers will have to take greater responsibility for their actions if only because the visual fidelity will be there to splatter our violent failings across the screen in HD detail. Having more of these games with varied missions, rules/laws you have to abide by, etc. Quote: The International Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. I thought that was the whole reasoning behind online gaming tears are just so sweet . purdu_2016 12 oct 2021. if someone actually implemented this. LeCard's example of enemies looking to surrender, having to subdue them, handcuff them, handle that aspect of the mission instead of just "er mah gerd shert shert shert them all, keep sherting til they're all deeeerd!". Need for speed players Blade and sorcery players . and our I don't think anyone would appreciate someone saying that about us based on a headline. In Battlefield 5 or Call of Duty 27, it may not be so simple to dismiss the sight of a photo-realistic person lying in the dust, eyes rolling back, limbs spasming. This is ehy gamers are the most oppressed people in society. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments reflection on innocent victims. But that's why the whole suggestion being made is the games follow the international war laws, Geneva Convention, things like that. Arma II sold 10x the copies for the zombie mod than the actual 'real life simulation' game play, hint. Is teabagging a freshly made corpse a war crime? Instead, the Committee hopes the consequences it requests will halt the potential "trivialization" of war crimes. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Which, when it comes to the moral implications of a game, is incredibly horrifying. Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123; Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities. Brno, South Moravia, Czechia. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. What would be the fun in games if we couldn't massacre civillians? The idea of an action adventure that put the player into a series of defining humanitarian situations allowing the story to spin-off in the player's moral direction is interesting but it's hugely unlikely in the action cinema world of the modern shooter. I remember my first go on Taitos explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics.